CloudPeek

Use case · Exposure - Exposure and vulnerability

CloudPeek helps your team decide which security weaknesses to fix first. It connects each finding to the affected system and its owner, prepares a proposed fix and checks the result after an approved change.

← All use cases
Use case
Exposure and vulnerability
What you get
Priorities people can explain
Who decides
Your team sets the authority.
Full CloudPeek investigation answering a request to summarise the last 24 hours of incidents
Ask what changed and what needs attention first, and review the tools the agent ran to answer.

The challenge

A long list of severe findings does not tell you where to start. Teams need to know which systems are exposed, what they support and how a fix can be delivered safely.

How CloudPeek helps

Exposure and vulnerability: an illustrative CloudPeek workflow
See how CloudPeek works · 30 secondsIllustrative scenario

  1. Connects a finding with the affected system, its owner, whether it can be reached by attackers and whether attackers are known to use the weakness, bringing the missing context into the review.

  2. Recommends an order of work based on that context and the importance of the affected systems, with a reason for each priority.

  3. Prepares the recommended update and change request, accounts for agreed times when changes can be made and checks the outcome after an authorised change.

What your team gets

Priorities people can explain

Give the vulnerability lead a ranked list with supporting reasons, rather than relying on severity labels alone.

A clearer route to a fix

Carry the recommended change and its constraints into the approval process, helping owners understand what needs to happen.

Evidence after the change

Record the verification work so your team can review the result instead of treating a completed change as proof.

You stay in control

Assessment starts without changing your systems. Your team approves changes or permits automation only for the systems you choose, within the limits and agreed times for changes that you set.

Talk to us
Explore the technical example
Runs on
Tenable · Qualys · Wiz · CMDB · ITSM
Autonomy
levels 1 to 3
CloudPeek // flow · finding to fixflow 03 · found to fixed
  • OT adjacency
  • asset criticality
  • runtime coverage
  • exploit intel
  1. FINDINGCVE-2026-1187
  2. REACHABILITYedge-gw · internet facing
  3. PRIORITISEcrown jewel adjacent
  4. FIX PLANpatch + config change
  5. APPROVEchange window · operator
  6. FIXEDverified closed
OT aware before it prioritises · nothing changes outside the windowEvery step recorded
CloudPeek // action trail · illustrative entriesautonomy level 2
  1. 09:26:41INGESTScanner findings received. 1,847 open across the estate.
  2. 09:26:52RESOLVEAssets matched to owners, business criticality and network exposure.
  3. 09:27:02ASSESSCVE-2026-1187 on edge-gw. Internet facing, known exploited, exploit code public.
  4. 09:27:08PRIORITISE3 findings meet all four conditions. 1,844 do not and are ranked accordingly.
  5. 09:27:15PREPAREPatch route identified, change window proposed, owner notified. Held for approval.
read only by default · policy bounded · kill switch with the operatorAll actions traced
At level 1A ranked list with the reasoning behind each position, ready for your vulnerability lead.
At level 2The patch route and change request are drafted and held. An operator authorises the change.
At level 3Patching runs within declared guardrails on asset classes you have nominated, then verifies.

Certifications & recognition

  • Tech Nation Rising Stars — Regional winner
  • Cyber Essentials Certified
  • Tech4Trust, powered by Trust Valley